Internet and citizen participation
an analysis of the impact of connectivity on civic engagement during the pre-election and post-election period in Angola
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica.822Palavras-chave:
civic participation, social media, Internet, connectivity, AngolaResumo
The digital revolution plays a pivotal role in the public sphere of contemporary societies. Social media have established themselves as a contested public space where various actors disseminate their messages. For instance, political parties utilise these platforms to propagate their ideologies and political agendas, aiming to influence citizens’ perceptions. Similarly, civil society organisations and other citizen groups primarily employ these platforms as channels for expressing protests and dissatisfaction with political governance. To investigate how internet access affects citizens’ engagement in the political sphere and to identify media instances where digital connectivity fosters civic participation in Angola, platforms such as Facebook and Instagram were analysed. These social networks were chosen due to their significance as spaces for political discussion in the country. Angola exemplifies the rising prominence of digital activism, with the utilisation of these platforms highlighting the expanding role of the internet in civic mobilisation and public debate. This research adopts both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Three Facebook pages and two Instagram pages, all "publicly accessible", were selected, and data pertaining to 2022 and 2023 were extracted. This period was marked by active social media usage by political actors and supporters of political parties to mobilise, communicate political ideologies, and address issues concerning politics and social challenges. The analysis of these pages employed the CrowdTangle tool, a data collection and extraction platform that facilitates the export of data from various sections of Facebook and Instagram (Rieder, 2013).The most frequently published content on the analysed Facebook and Instagram pages during the specified period centred on themes such as "calls for votes, election results, public petitions, public complaints, challenges to election results, police repression, arrests during protests, protests, transparent communication, electoral transparency, and the monitoring of the electoral process". These posts garnered substantial engagement from Angolan users on the platforms.
Downloads
Referências
Afrobarometer. (2023). The closure of the internet in Senegal is another sign of a democracy in danger. Retrieved from https://www.afrobarometer.org/feature/annual-report-2023/.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
Bitman, N. (2023). ‘Which part of my group do I represent?’: disability activism and social media users with concealable communicative disabilities. Information, Communication & Society, 26(3), 619–636.
Bosch, T. (2018). Digital media and political citizenship: Facebook and politics in South Africa. In B. Mutsvairo, & B. Karam (Eds.), Perspectives on political Communication in Africa, Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 145–158).
Bosch, T. (2019). Social media and protest movements in South Africa. In Social media and politics in Africa: Democracy, censorship and security (pp. 66–86).
Bosch, T. E., Admire, M., & Ncube, M. (2020). Facebook and politics in Africa: Zimbabwe and Kenya. Media, Culture & Society, 42(3), 349–364.
Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 39–54.
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2023). # Stand with women in Afghanistan: Civic participation, symbolism, and morality in political activism on Twitter. Discourse & Communication, 17(6), 721–740.
Carpini, M. D. (2004). Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications on citizens’ involvement in political and civic life. Handbook of political communication research, 357-394.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Clarke, A. (2010). Social media: 4. Political uses and implications for representative democracy. Parliamentary Information and Research Service.
Cohen, C. J., Kahne, J., Bowyer, B., Middaugh, E., & Rogowski, J. (2012). New media and youth political action. Youth and Participatory Politics Survey Project, DML Central.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920.
DataReportal. (2023). Global digital statshot: October 2023. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-october-global-statshot.
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616.
Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118.
Ditchfield, H., & Meredith, J. (2018). Collecting qualitative data from Facebook: Approaches and methods. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 496-510.
Dundão, S. (2023). As eleições angolanas: O impacto da guerra e do sistema eleitoral. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, 45, 135–167.
Enli, G., & Moe, H. (2013). Introduction to special issue: Social media and election campaigns–key tendencies and ways forward. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 637–645.
European Commission. (n.d.). European Citizens' Initiative. https://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/home_en.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Herring, M. Y. (2015). Social media and the good life: Do they connect?. Mcfarland & Company, Incorporated Publishers.
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press.
Kalliny, M., Ghanem, S., & Kalliny, M. (2018). The impact of advertising and media on the Arab culture: The case of the Arab spring, public spheres, and social media. Journal of Political Marketing, 17(1), 62–89.
Kamau, S. C. (2017). Democratic engagement in the digital age: youth, social media and participatory politics in Kenya. Communicatio, 43(2), 128-146.
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805.
Lapa, T., & Cardoso, G. (2016). (Social) media isn’t the message, networked people are: calls for protest through social media. (Social) media isn’t the message, networked people are: calls for protest through social media, 202-219.
Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Book Review: Citizens or Consumers: What the Media Tell Us about Political Participation. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 250-252.
Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of communication, 62(2), 231-248.
Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). Introduction: The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. In The networked young citizen (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
Mare, A. (2018). ‘Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place’? A Comparative Study of How Business Journalists Negotiate Ethical Policies in Kenya and South Africa. Newsmaking cultures in Africa: Normative trends in the dynamics of socio-political & economic struggles, 207-228.
Mpako, A., & Pacatolo, C. (2023). In Angola, the majority of rural residents are deprived of access to the electricity grid. Afrobarometer, 664, 1–9. https://www.afrobarometer.org/.
Mukhongo, L. L. (2014). Negotiating the new media platforms: Youth and political images in Kenya. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 328-341.
Ndlovu, M., & Mbenga, C. (2013). Facebook, the public sphere and political youth leagues in South Africa. Journal of African Media Studies, 5(2), 169-186.
Nelson, J. L., Lewis, D. A., & Lei, R. (2017). Digital democracy in America: A look at civic engagement in an internet age. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 318-334.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press google schola, 2, 12–136.
Park, S., Lee, J. Y., Notley, T., & Dezuanni, M. (2023). Exploring the relationship between media literacy, online interaction, and civic engagement. The Information Society, 39(4), 250-261.
Ookla. (2023). Worldwide connectivity: Mobile and fixed networks digital divide 2023. https://www.ookla.com/articles/worldwide-connectivity-mobile-fixed-networks-digital-divide-2023.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–683.
Rahaghi, J. (2012). New tools, old goals: Comparing the role of technology in the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the 2009 Green Movement. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 151-182.
Rieder, B. (2013, May). Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM web science conference (pp. 346-355).
Shirky, C. (2011a). A cultura da participação: criatividade e generosidade no mundo conectado. Editora Schwarcz — Companhia das Letras.
Shirky, C. (2011b). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign affairs, 90(1) ( 28–41.
Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), DOI: 1609406915624574.
Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395–416.
Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269.
Sullivan, A. L. (2009). Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(4), 369–386.
Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379.
Walsh, L., Hyett, N., Hewson, D., Howley, J., Juniper, N., Li, C., ... & Hill, S. (2022). Social media for consumer engagement: Co-creating guidance for hospitals, service providers and consumers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, DOI: 10.1177/16094069221132173
Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Where have all the voters gone? Harvard University Press.
Westling, M. (2007). Expanding the public sphere: The impact of Facebook on political communication. The New Vernacular, 28, 1-13.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Comunicação Pública
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Os conteudos da Comunicação Publica estão licenciados com uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
