The reception of the television sitcom Friends in Portugal

a comparative analysis of Generations X, Y and Z

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica.743

Keywords:

audio-visual reception, entertainment, television fiction, sitcom, Friends

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the reception of the American television sitcom Friends in Portugal, by comparing generations X, Y and Z. The analysis focuses on generational differences on the reception and the acquired gratifications regarding a sitcom that reached an influence and a longevity that goes well beyond its ten seasons. Adopting a quantitative approach, data was collected through a survey, with a sample of 608 respondents from generations X, Y and Z. It was possible to analyse the differences in the way these three generations make meaning out of this media content, confirming that they are looking for distinct gratifications and develop different identification and empathy connections with the characters. The results thus show the impact of a sitcom originally produced more than twenty years ago that not only transcends generations but also impacts them differently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Isabel Cabo, School of Communication and Media Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon (ESCS - IPL)

    Master’s in Audiovisual and Multimedia from the School of Communication and Media Studies (ESCS-IPL). She  holds  a  degree  in Communication Sciences from School of Social and Political Sciences (ISCSP),University of Lisbon. She has a great interest in audiovisual, mainly in the area of media audience reception. She is currently working as an assistant producer in a dubbing studio.

  • Filipe Montargil, School of Communication and Media Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon (ESCS - IPL)

    Professor at the School of Communication and Media Studies (ESCS-IPL). Currently also an invited professor at NOVA IMS –Information Management School, NOVA University Lisbon, and at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, in Warsaw. His main area of expertise is sociology, mostly focusing   on   the   relationships and   the   interfaces   between   society, technology, communication, participation, and innovation.

  • Cláudia Silvestre, School of Communication and Media Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon (ESCS - IPL)

    Cláudia Silvestre is a professor at the School of Communication and Media Studies (ESCS-IPL). She holds a degree and a master in Probabilities and Statistics from the Science University of Lisbon, and PHD in Quantitative Methods from the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE). She teaches Statistics applied to communications and develops research in the area.  Her research interests include statistical literacy, data analysis, clustering, mixture models, and big data.

References

Alasuutari, P. (1996). Television as a Moral Issue. In P. L. Crawford & S. B. Hafsteinsson (Eds.), The construction of the viewer: Media ethnography and the anthropology of audiences (pp. 101-117). Intervention Press.

Allen, R. (1980). Functionalism and use and gratifications: A comparison and contrast. Delaware.

Austerlitz, S. (2019). Generation Friends. Dutton.

Doherty, C., Kiley, J., Tyson, A., & Jameson, B. (2015, September). The whys and hows of generations research. Pew Research Center, 17.

Dou, W., Wang, G., & Zhou, N. (2006). Generational and regional differences in media consumption patterns of Chinese generation x consumers. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639230.

Fedele, M. (2011). El consum adolescent de la ficció seriada televisiva (p. 254). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/83502

Grandío, M. (2009). El entretenimiento televisivo. Un estudio de audiencia desde la noción de gusto. Comunicación y Sociedad, 22(2), 139-158.

Hargrave, A. M., & Gatfield, L. (2002). Soap box or soft soap? Audience attitudes to the British soap opera. Broadcasting Standards Comission.

Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270.

Herzog, H. (1941). On Borrowed Experience. An Analysis of Listening to Daytime Sketches. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9(1), 65-95.

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution – Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton University Press.

Jiménez, A. G., López, M. C., & Pisionero, C. G. (2012). A vision of uses and gratifications applied to the study of internet use by adolescents. Communication and Society, 25(2), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.25.36168.

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Westerwick, A., & Sude, D. J. (2019). Media choice and selective exposure. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491146.

Knox, S., & Schwind, K. H. (2019). Friends: A reading of the sitcom. Palgrave Macmillan.

Kutulas, J. (2018). Anatomy of a hit: Friends and its sitcom legacies. Journal of Popular Culture, 0(0), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12715.

Lacalle, C. (2015). Young people and television fiction. Reception analysis. Communications, 40(2), 237-255. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2015-0006.

Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. Media studies: A reader (2nd Ed., pp. 18-30). Edinburgh University Press, 1999.

Livingstone, S. (1988). Why people watch soap opera: An analysis of the explanations of British viewers. European Journal of Communication, 3, 55-80.

Livingstone, S. (2004). Media audiences: Effects, users, institutions, and power. Sage.

McQuail, D., & Deuze, M. (2020). McQuail’s media and mass communication theory. Sage.

Rubin, A. (2009). Uses and gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 533-547). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877111-14.

Ruggiero, T. E. (2000, February). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st Century. In R. Wei (Ed.), Refining Milestone Mass Communications Theories for the 21st Century, 36-70. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679402-4.

Sandell, J. (1998). The personal is professional on TV. I’ll be there for you: Friends and the fantasy of alternative families. American Studies, 39(2), 141-155.

Smith, M. (2022). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford University Press.

Tefertiller, A., & Sheehan, K. (2019). TV in the streaming age: Motivations, behaviors, and satisfaction of post-network television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 63(4), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1698233.

Todd, A. M. (2011). Saying goodbye to Friends: Fan culture as lived experience. Journal of Popular Culture, 44(4), 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2011.00866.x.

Zsila, Á., Orosz, G., Demetrovics, Z., & Urbán, R. (2020). Motives for viewing animated sitcoms and their associations with humor styles, positivity, and self-criticism in a sample of Hungarian viewers. Plos One, 15(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230474.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE: Audiovisual and Multimedia Studies

How to Cite

The reception of the television sitcom Friends in Portugal: a comparative analysis of Generations X, Y and Z. (2023). Comunicação Pública, 18(34). https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica.743