Proust e os Signos

Sinais de um pensamento estrangeiro

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica.690

Keywords:

signs, literature, philosophy, Deleuze, Proust

Abstract

Proust e os Signos is a trail-book that passes through three points and lasts, intensifying, between them. There, the movement of Gilles Deleuze's thought unfolds, in a brilliant way: his aesthetic ontology. The three points are dates, therefore, events: 1964 for Part I of the book (then entitled Marcel Proust et les Signes); 1970, when Part II is added (with Proust's own name dropped from the title); and 1976, the year of the third edition of Proust et les Signes (the Portuguese version corresponds to that edition), in which a reformulated Part II appears with new chapters, including a conclusion entitled “Presence and function of madness, the spider”. Proust e os Signos is still a hybrid place, between two, between literature and philosophy, between Deleuze and Proust, between the pleasure of reading and an unforeseeable tought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Luis Lima, Autónoma University of Lisbon – UAL

    Ph.D. in Philosophy – Aesthetics, from FCSH/NOVA University of Lisbon, having received a doctoral scholarship from the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. He was a scholarship holder from the Foundation for Science and Technology in the master's program in Communication, Contemporary Culture, and New Technologies at the same university. He has collaborated as a journalist in various publications (Volta ao Mundo, National Geographic magazine, Arte Ibérica, Arte Capital, etc.). Since 2018, he has been part of the organizing committee of the Fórum do Real and the selection committee of the Porto/Post/Doc film festival. He is an Associate Professor at the Autónoma University of Lisbon and a lecturer at the School of Design - IPCA, where he teaches Image Theories, Creative Writing, and Cyberculture. He also works as a freelance translator in the fields of essay, arts, and literature (Deleuze, Rancière, Didi-Huberman, Stiegler, Mondzain, Klossowski, etc.). He is an integrated researcher at LabCom (Communication and Arts) and a collaborator at CEAA (Arts and Critical Studies), also being part of the Communication Research Center – Nip.com, at UAL

References

Deleuze, G. (1965). Nietzsche. P.U.F.

Deleuze, G. (1966). Le bergsonisme. P.U.F.

Deleuze, G. (1967). Présentation de Sacher-Masoch. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. P.U.F.

Deleuze, G. (1968). Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. (1969). Logique du sens. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. (1970). Spinoza – philosophie pratique. P.U.F.

Deleuze, G. (1977). Proust et les signes. P.U.F.

Deleuze, G. (1988). Le pli – Leibniz et le Baroque. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. (1993). Critique et clinique. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Cixous, H. (1973). Littérasophie et philosofiture. In Dialogues (p. 30).

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1972). Capitalisme et schizophrénie 1, L’anti-Œdipe. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1975). Kafka pour une littérature mineure. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1976). Rhizome. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1980). Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2, Mille plateaux. Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Minuit.

Deleuze, G. & Lima, L. (Trad.) (2022). Proust e os signos. Barco Bêbado.

Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours. Gallimard.

Proust, M. (1913-1927). À la recherche du temps perdu. Gallimard.

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Proust e os Signos: Sinais de um pensamento estrangeiro. (2022). Comunicação Pública, 17(33). https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica.690