Opinião e argumentação na esfera pública digital
em busca da controvérsia nas malhas que as redes tecem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34629/cpublica_897Palavras-chave:
Rede Social X, Comentadores, DiscussãoResumo
Neste texto questiona-se a existência de discussão e discordância de ideias nas plataformas de média sociais, particularmente na plataforma X. O panorama atual, tão contaminado por desinformação e discursos extremistas (agudizando-se a contestação às Big Tech e o abandono de algumas plataformas digitais), sugere que convoquemos contributos teóricos que remetam para o desencanto com as TIC e para a perda de racionalidade na esfera digital. É na direção desta última que também nos conduzem os resultados da pesquisa que se apresenta, através da qual se pretendeu indagar se quem participa nos programas de debate e comentário político dos canais de televisão também discute, entre si, na rede social X (por ora ainda a mais direcionada para a discussão de temas políticos). Para tal, analisaram-se as publicações das contas de dez utilizadores desta plataforma durante o último quadrimestre de 2023.
Downloads
Referências
Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and
representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 62–82.
Barriga, A. C. (2007). Media, política e opinião: Uma tríade complexa — Uma abordagem à opinião publicada em Portugal. [Tese de doutoramento]. ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
Barriga, A. C. (2015). O debate político nas contra esferas públicas: Como se discute em 140 carateres. Media & Jornalismo, Número Especial, 111–126.
Barriga, A. C. (2017). Sobre a ausência de pluralismo nos media: Como observar a invisibilidade do debate político nos novos media? In A. Moreira, E. Araújo, & H. Sousa (Eds.), Comunicação e política: Tempos, contextos e desafios (pp. 21–43).
Barros, J. L. (2021). O Jornalismo Político Republicano Radical — O Mundo, 1900–1907. Ed. Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa.
Beckett, L., Bhuiyan, J., Clayton, A., & Paul, K. (2023, julho 8). Twitter is dead, long live Threads: Journalists write eulogies for the platform. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/08/twitter-demise-journalists-eulogy-threads-app-elon-musk
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Bjola, C., & Papadakis, K. (2020). Digital propaganda, counterpublics and the disruption of the public sphere: The Finnish approach to building digital resilience. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221
Boeder, P. (2005). Habermas’ heritage: The future of the public sphere in the networked society. First Monday, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i9.1280
Breynner, J. (2014, junho 11). Can Twitter survive in a Facebook world? The key is being different. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/11/can-twitter-survive-in-a-facebook-world-the-key-is-being-different/
Carlin, D., Schill, D., Levasseus, D., & King, A. (2005). The post-9/11 public sphere: citizen talk about the 2004 presidential debates. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 8(4), 617–638.
Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business and society.
Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online
deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 615–633.
Dahlgren, P. (2000). L’espace public et l’internet. Structure, espace et communication. Réseaux,
(100), 157–186.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and
deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.
Dixit, P. (2023, outubro 27). Twitter takeover: how a year of Elon Musk rendered the platform
useless. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/27/elon-musk-twitter-x-one-year-anniversary
Fragoso, S., Recuero, R., & Amaral, A. (2011). Métodos de pesquisa para internet. Sulina.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A critical introduction. Sage Publications Ltd.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh University of Edinburgh:
Social Sciences Research Centre. http://cdclv.unlv.edu/ega
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (2023). A new structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Hickey D., Fessler, D. M. T., Lerman, K., & Burghardt, K. (2025). X under Musk’s leadership: Substantial hate and no reduction in inauthentic activity. PLoS ONE, 20(2), artigo e0313293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313293
Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton University Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2018). Public service in the age of social network media. In G. F. Lowe, H. Van den
Bulck, & K. Donders (Eds.), Public service media in the networked society (pp. 59–74). Nordicom.
Jensen, J. L. (2013). Political participation online: The replacement and the mobilisation
hypotheses revisited. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12008
Kellner, D. (1999). Globalisation from below? Toward a radical democratic technopolitics. Angelaki, Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 4(2), 101–113.
Kozinets, R. V. (2007). Netnography 2.0. In R. W. Belk (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 129–142.
Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics:
An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 87–111.
Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2011). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010
Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 13, 1180–1197.
Lévy, P. (2002). Cyberdémocratie. Éditions Odile Jacob.
Mahlouly, D. (2013). Rethinking the public sphere in a digital environment: similarities between
the eighteenth and the twenty-first centuries. ESharp, 20(6), 1–21.
Moore, R. (1999). Democracy and cyberspace. In B. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital
democracy: Discourse and decision making in the Information Age (pp. 101–113). Routledge.
Morton, H. (2001). Computer-mediated communication in Australian anthropology and
sociology. Social Analysis Journal of Cultural and Social Practices, 45, 3–11.
Noveck, B. (1999). Transparent space: Law, technology and deliberative democracy in the
information society. In C. Kratx (Ed.), Cultural values. Blackwell.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media &
Society, 4, 9–27.
Peixinho, A., & Dias, L. (2018). The intellectual, the artist and the masses in Portuguese culture
at the end of the century. Estudos do Século XX — Revista do Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares da Universidade de Coimbra, 18. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8622_18_7
Pickard, V. W. (2006). Assessing the radical democracy of indymedia: discursive, technical, and
institutional constructions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(1), 19–38.
Quelle D., & Bovet, A. (2025). Bluesky: Network topology, polarization, and algorithmic curation. PLoS ONE, 20(2), artigo e0318034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318034
Ramada Curto, D. (2018, fevereiro 4). Polémicas à portuguesa. Expresso. https://expresso.pt/cultura/2018-02-04-Polemicas-a-portuguesa
Schäfer, M. S. (2016). Digital public sphere. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The International
Encyclopedia of Political Communication: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087
Simmel, G. (2006). Questões fundamentais de Sociologia: indivíduo e sociedade. Zahar.
Slevin, J. (2000). The Internet and society. Polity Press.
Törnberg, P., & Chueri, J. (2025). When do parties lie? Misinformation and radical-right
populism across 26 countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241311886
Trenz, H-J., Heft, A., & Vaughan, M. (2021). Resilience of public spheres in a global health
crisis. Javnost — The Public, 28(2), 111–128 https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1919385
Warnick, B. (2007). Rhetoric online: Persuasion and politics on the World Wide Web. Peter
Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Copyright (c) 2025 Author
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Os conteúdos da Comunicação Pública estão licenciados com uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
