A comunicação do risco em medicina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4000/cp.11386Palavras-chave:
comunicação do risco, consulta, decisão partilhadaResumo
A comunicação do risco (CR) é um dos maiores desafios para a saúde pública e na prática clínica.
O desejo dos profissionais de saúde e dos utentes é que se tomem as melhores decisões. Contudo, a forma como o clínico transmite a informação condiciona as escolhas do sujeito. Este pode fazer escolhas que não são consentâneas com as evidências reveladas pela ciência. E a ciência pode-lhe impor decisões que não são consentâneas com os seus valores. Neste processo comunicacional está em causa um mensageiro, uma mensagem e um recetor que se pretende decisor de uma ação. A CR efetiva é fulcral para uma decisão informada. Na CR, o profissional deve ter em conta as suas atitudes perante a tomada de decisão, em contexto clínico, conhecer as ferramentas comunicacionais e adaptar os seus comportamentos às necessidades do paciente.
O presente trabalho foca-se na CR no encontro face a face entre profissional de saúde e paciente. Partindo da revisão narrativa da literatura e da experiência do autor, como médico e investigador, pretendeu-se propor um modelo de estratégia estruturada para o processo da CR na prática clínica.
Downloads
Referências
Adams, J. (1995). Risk: The policy implications of risk compensation and plural rationalities. London: UCL Press.
Ahl, A. S., Acree, J. A., Gipson, P. S., McDowell, R. M., Miller, L., & McElvaine, M. D. (1993). Standardization of nomenclature for animal health risk analysis. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 12(4), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.12.4.744.
DOI : 10.20506/rst.12.4.744
Aleksandr, S., Peters, E., Tusler, M., & Fraenkel, L. (2015). Presenting numeric information with percentages and descriptive risk labels: A randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 35(8), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15584922.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X15584922
Barratt, A., Edwards, A., Trevena, L., McCaffery, K., Woloshin, S., Bekker, H., … Charvet, A. (2005). Presenting probabilities. IPDAS Collaboration Background Document, (c), 1–54.
Bell, N. R., Dickinson, J. A., Grad, R., Singh, H., Kasperavicius, D., & Thombs, B. D. (2018). Understanding and communicating risk: Measures of outcome and the magnitude of benefits and harms. Canadian Family Physician, 64(3), 181–191.
Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2015). Metaphors and risk cognition in the discourse on food-borne diseases. Risk and Cognition, 80, 89-105.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45704-7_4.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-45704-7_4
Blalock, S. J., DeVellis, R. F., Chewning, B., Sleath, B. L., & Reyna, V. F. (2016). Gist and verbatim communication concerning medication risks/benefits. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(6), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.001.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.001
Blanch-Hartigan, D., van Eeden, M., Verdam, M. G. E., Han, P. K. J., Smets, E. M. A., & Hillen, M. A. (2019). Effects of communication about uncertainty and oncologist gender on the physician-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(9), 1613–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.002.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.002
Bonner, C., McKinn, S., Lau, A., Jansen, J., Doust, J., Trevena, L., & McCaffery, K. (2018). Heuristics and biases in cardiovascular disease prevention: How can we improve communication about risk, benefits and harms? Patient Education and Counseling, 101(5), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.003
Büchter, R. B., Fechtelpeter, D., Knelangen, M., Ehrlich, M., & Waltering, A. (2014). Words or numbers? Communicating risk of adverse effects in written consumer health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-76.
DOI : 10.1186/1472-6947-14-76
Cheung, Y. B., Wee, H. L., Thumboo, J., Goh, C., Pietrobon, R., Toh, H. C., … Tan, S. B. (2010). Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-55.
DOI : 10.1186/1472-6947-10-55
Damman, O. C., Vonk, S. I., van den Haak, M. J., van Hooijdonk, C. M. J., & Timmermans, D. R. M. (2018). The effects of infographics and several quantitative versus qualitative formats for cardiovascular disease risk, including heart age, on people’s risk understanding. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(8), 1410–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.015
Deborah L. Helitzer, LaNoue, M., Wilson, B., Hernandez, B. U. de, Warner, T., & Roter, D. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of communication training with primary care providers to improve patient-centeredness and health risk communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.021.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.021
Ea, A., Ad, O., Herrin, J., Ge, V., Terrenato, I., Sperati, F., … Schünemann, H. (2011). Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006776.pub2.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.CD006776.pub2
Edwards, A. G. K., Naik, G., Ahmed, H., Elwyn, G. J., Pickles, T., Hood, K., & Playle, R. (2013). Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(2), 1–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
DOI : 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3
Edwards, A., Gray, J., Clarke, A., Dundon, J., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C., … Thornton, H. (2008). Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: Systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 71(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.026.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.026
Edwards, Adrian, Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information: A review of the effects of “framing’ and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730150501413.
DOI : 10.1080/10810730150501413
Edwards, Adrian, Elwyn, G., Hood, K., Robling, M., Atwell, C., Holmes-Rovner, M., … Russell, I. (2003). The development of COMRADE - A patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 50(3), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00055-7.
DOI : 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00055-7
Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2006). Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002
European Commission. (2009). Guideline on summary of product characteristics. Notice to Applicants, 2C, 2, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4206.OJ.
Eyler, R. F., Cordes, S., Szymanski, B. R., & Fraenkel, L. (2017). Utilization of continuous “spinners” to communicate risk. Physiology and Behavior, 37(6), 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17707198.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X17707198
Fischhof, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 137–145.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x
Flynn, D., Ford, G. A., Stobbart, L., Rodgers, H., Murtagh, M. J., & Thomson, R. G. (2013). A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: Lessons for tool developers. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-225.
DOI : 10.1186/1472-6963-13-225
Fraenkel, L., Reyna, V., Cozmuta, R., Cornell, D., Nolte, J., & Wilhelms, E. (2018). Do visual aids influenced patients’ risk perceptions for rare and very rare risks? Patient Education and Counseling, 101(11), 1900–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.007
Fransen, M., Meertens, R., & Schrander-Stumpel, C. (2006). Communication and risk presentation in genetic counseling: Development of a checklist. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.018.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.018
French, D. P., Cameron, E., Benton, J. S., Deaton, C., & Harvie, M. (2017). Can communicating personalised disease risk promote healthy behaviour change? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(5), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z.
DOI : 10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z
Furedi, A. (1999). The public health implications of the 1995 “pill scare.” Human Reproduction Update, 5(6), 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.6.621.
DOI : 10.1093/humupd/5.6.621
Gamhewage, G. (2014). An introduction to risk communication. Who, (November 2013), 1–6. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/risk-communication/introduction-to-risk-communication.pdf.
Garcia-Retamero, R., Okan, Y., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). Using visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: A review. The Scientific World Journal, 562637. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/562637.
DOI : 10.1100/2012/562637
Ghanouni, A., Nuttall, E., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2017). Testing whether barriers to a hypothetical screening test affect unrelated perceived benefits and vice versa: A randomised, experimental study. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(2), e1–e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.007
Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: From innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327(7417), 741–744. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x
Gouveia, M., Rodrigues, I. P., & Pinto, D. (2018). Importância da validação dos modelos de risco cardiovascular nos cuidados de saúde primários. Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral, 24(3), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v34i3.12449.
DOI : 10.32385/rpmgf.v34i3.12449
Grady, A., Carey, M., Bryant, J., Sanson-Fisher, R., & Hobden, B. (2017). A systematic review of patient-practitioner communication interventions involving treatment decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.010
Guan, Y., Roter, D. L., Wolff, J. L., Gitlin, L. N., Christensen, K. D., Roberts, J. S., & Erby, L. H. (2018). The impact of genetic counselors’ use of facilitative strategies on cognitive and emotional processing of genetic risk disclosure for Alzheimer’s disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(5), 817–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.019.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.019
Halley, M. C., Rendle, K. A. S., & Frosch, D. L. (2013). A conceptual model of the multiple stages of communication necessary to support patient-centered care. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.13.46.
DOI : 10.2217/cer.13.46
Hamstra, D. A., Johnson, S. B., Daignault, S., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Taylor, J. M., Larkin, K., … Angela Fagerlin. (2015). The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14551639.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X14551639
Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., Killam, B., Lehman, T., Massett, H., & Freedman, A. N. (2012). Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: Effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.033.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.033
Helitzer, D. L., LaNoue, M., Wilson, B., de Hernandez, B. U., Warner, T., & Roter, D. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of communication training with primary care providers to improve patient-centeredness and health risk communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.021.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.021
Henneman, L., Marteau, T. M., & Timmermans, D. R. M. (2008). Clinical geneticists’ and genetic counselors’ views on the communication of genetic risks: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.009
Hooker, C., Capon, A., & Leask, J. (2017). Communicating about risk: Strategies for situations where public concern is high but the risk is low. Public Health Research and Practice, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2711709.
DOI : 10.17061/phrp2711709
Kahneman, D. (2017). Pensar depressa e devagar. Lisboa: Circulo de Leitores.
Knapp, P., Gardner, P. H., & Woolf, E. (2016). Combined verbal and numerical expressions increase perceived risk of medicine side-effects: A randomized controlled trial of EMA recommendations. Health Expectations, 19(2), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12344.
DOI : 10.1111/hex.12344
Kunneman, M., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Pieterse, A. H. (2020). Do clinicians convey what they intend? Lay interpretation of verbal risk labels used in decision encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(2), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.035.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.035
Leiss, W. (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001009.
DOI : 10.1177/0002716296545001009
Mendes, J. M. (2016). Sociologia do risco: Uma breve introdução e algumas lições. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1066-5.
DOI : 10.14195/978-989-26-1066-5
Navar, A. M., Stone, N. J., & Martin, S. S. (2016). What to say and how to say it: Effective communication for cardiovascular disease prevention Current Opinion in Cardiology, 31(5), 537–544. https://doi.org/:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000322.
DOI : 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000322
O’Connor, A. M., Drake, E. R., Wells, G. A., Tugwell, P., Laupacis, A., & Elmslie, T. (2003). A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expectations, 6(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x
O’Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., … Drake, E. (1998). A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: Decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling, 33(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00026-3.
DOI : 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00026-3
Patel, R. S., Lagord, C., Waterall, J., Moth, M., Knapton, M., & Deanfield, J. E. (2016). Online self-assessment of cardiovascular risk using the Joint British Societies (JBS3)-derived heart age tool: a descriptive study. BMJ Open, 6(9), e011511. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011511.
DOI : 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011511
Rippl, S. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042598.
DOI : 10.1080/13669870110042598
Röttele, N., Schöpf-Lazzarino, A. C., Becker, S., Körner, M., Boeker, M., & Wirtz, M. A. (2020). Agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical encounters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interrater agreement. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(10):1873-1882https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.002.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.002
Sandman, P. M. (2012). Responding to community outrage: Strategies fpr effective risk communication. S.l.: Americam Industrial Hygiene Association.
Schiavo, R., May Leung, M., & Brown, M. (2014). Communicating risk and promoting disease mitigation measures in epidemics and emerging disease settings. Pathogens and Global Health, 108(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000127.
DOI : 10.1179/2047773214Y.0000000127
Sisk, B. A., Mack, J. W., & DuBois, J. (2019). Knowing versus doing: The value of behavioral change models for emotional communication in oncology. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(12), 2344–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.023.
Skolbekken, J.-A. (1998). Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. British Medical Journal, 316, 1956–1958. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7055.438.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.313.7055.438
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
Sopory, P. (2017). Metaphor in health and risk communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, (June), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.304.
DOI : 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.304
Speiser, D., Rebitschek, F. G., Feufel, M. A., Brand, H., Besch, L., & Kendel, F. (2019). Accuracy in risk understanding among BRCA1/2-mutation carriers. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(10), 1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.007
Stellamanns, J., Ruetters, D., Dahal, K., Schillmoeller, Z., & Huebner, J. (2017). Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(8), 1421–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.003
Stephens, A. L., & Bruce, C. R. (2018). Setting expectations for ECMO: Improving communication between clinical teams and decision makers. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 14(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-14-2-120.
Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracin, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729.
DOI : 10.1037/a0039729
Thomson, R., Robinson, A., Greenaway, J., Lowe, P., Parkin, D., Eccles, M., … Hutchinson, E. (2002). Development and description of a decision analysis based decision support tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.1.25.
DOI : 10.1136/qhc.11.1.25
Timmermans, D., Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout, A., & Kievit, J. (2004). Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient Education and Counseling, 54(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00238-6.
DOI : 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00238-6
Visschers, V. H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W. F., & De Vries, N. N. K. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis, 29(2), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
Welkenhuysen, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., & D’Ydewalle, G. (2001). The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: Framing and verbal versus numerical information. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00161-0.
DOI : 10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00161-0
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2010). Risky feelings: Why a 6% risk of cancer doesn’t always feel like 6%. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(S1), 87–93. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041
Zipkin, D. A., Umscheid, C. A., Keating, N. L., Allen, E., Aung, K., Beyth, R., … Feldstein, D. A. (2014). Evidence-based risk communication: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161(4), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0295.
DOI : 10.7326/M14-0295
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
Os conteudos da Comunicação Publica estão licenciados com uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
