Portrait of the scientific production of the Member-states of the Community of Portuguese-Speaking Countries in the health sciences: a bibliometric study

Authors

  • Maria Luz Antunes Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. APPsyCI – Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion. ISPA – Instituto Universitário. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Paula Seguro-de-Carvalho Gabinete de Projetos Especiais, de Investigação e Inovação. Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2221

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, Scientific production, Health sciences, Community of Portuguese-Speaking Countries, PALOP

Abstract

Introduction – The present study analyzes the scientific production in health in a set of countries that share the history and the Portuguese language, but essentially mutual development goals, based on cooperation and friendship. The aim of the study is to characterize the research developed by the CPLP Member States, based on the scientific production carried out in the health studies, which are indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Method – The information retrieved was organized and analyzed using several bibliometric variables: i) totals of scientific production; (ii) research fields; iii) study typology; iv) selected journals; v) authors' productivity; vi) institutional affiliation of the authors; (vii) international partnerships; (viii) funding agencies; and ix) publication language. Results – The results are of diverse magnitude. Health research represents in some countries half or more of indexed scientific production. There is a predominance of articles, published mostly in quartile 1 journals, followed by meeting abstracts and review articles. Institutional affiliation points to the absolute predominance of Brazilian universities in scientific production, as well as Portuguese universities and hospitals. The geographical proximity of each Member State is shown when establishing institutional partnerships. Funding for research is provided by foundations and scientific institutes in several countries, by the European Commission, and the Ministries of Health. English is the most prominent publication language, followed by Portuguese. Discussion – The analysis seeks to demonstrate how health research has been viewed in each particular country, benefiting the scientific community from the particular commitment of researchers in these countries. Local health studies benefit from more in-depth knowledge of populations, interventions, and outcomes, making it possible to extract new scientific knowledge and new forms of comparability – a directly related impact to the creation of public policies and healthier interventions. Conclusions – This study allows a graphic image of the scientific production of the CPLP Member States in health studies. Some lines are planned for the future: an aggregate analysis of scientific studies and more information resources, an observatory of the CPLP scientific production, and the invitation to further bibliometric studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moed HF. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer; 2005.

Spinak E. Diccionario enciclopédico de bibliometría, cienciometría y informetría. Caracas: UNESCO; 1996.

Antunes ML. Caracterização da amostra portuguesa da área da saúde na Web of Science. In: X Jornadas APDIS. Lisboa: APDIS; 2012.

May RM. The scientific wealth of nations. Science. 1997;275(5301):793-6.

Plume A, van Weijan D. Publish or perish? The rise of the fractional author… Res Trends. 2014;(38):16-8.

Elsevier. Scopus: an eye on global research. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018.

Antunes ML, Costa T. Caracterização da produção científica portuguesa da área da saúde indexada na Scopus. In: XII Jornadas APDIS, Reitoria da Universidade de Coimbra, 20-22 de Abril de 2016. Lisboa: APDIS; 2016.

Elsevier. Scopus announces launch of the user-friendly Scopus Journal Analyzer [homepage]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/about/pressreleases/science-and-technology/scopus-announces-launch-of-the-user-friendlyscopus-journal-analyzer

Clarivate Analytics. It’s time to get the facts. London: Clarivate Analytics; 2017. Available from: https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/d6b7faae-3cc2-4186-8985-a6ecc8cce1ee_Crv_WoS_Upsell_Factbook_A4_FA_LR_edits.pdf

Clarke A, Gatineau M, Grimaud O, Royer-Devaux S, Wyn-Roberts N, Le Bis I, et al. A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17 Suppl 1:43-9.

Vieira RQ, Sanna MC. O uso do estudo bibliométrico pelos pesquisadores da saúde em periódicos científicos digitais brasileiros. In: Anais do XXV Congresso Brasileiro de Biblioteconomia, Documentação e Ciência da Informação-FEBAB, Florianópolis, SC. 2013;25:4036-51.

Conner N, Provedel A, Maciel EL. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva: análise da produção científica e redes colaborativas de pesquisa [Ciência & Saúde Coletiva: scientific production analysis and collaborative research networks]. Cienc Saude Colet. 2017;22(3):987-96. Portuguese

Coimbra Jr CE. Produção científica em saúde pública e as bases bibliográficas internacionais [Scientific production in public health and the international literature bases]. Cad Saúde Pública. 1999;15(4):883-8. Portuguese

Comunidade de Países de Língua Portuguesa. Plano estratégico de cooperação em saúde da CPLP (PECS-CPLP), 2018-2021: eixos estratégicos, áreas e projetos. CPLP; 2018.

Uthman OA, Uthman MB. Geography of Africa biomedical publications: an analysis of 1996-2005 PubMed papers. Int J Health Geogr. 2007;6:46.

Nachega JB, Uthman OA, Ho Y-S, Lo M, Anude C, Kayembe P, et al. Current status and future prospects of epidemiology and public health training and research in the WHO African region. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1829-46.

Fresta MJ, Ferreira MA, Delgado AP, Sambo MR, Torgal J, Sidat M, et al. Estabelecimento de uma rede estruturante da cooperação em educação médica, no âmbito do PECS-CPLP [Towards a PECS-CPLP netwok for medical education]. An Inst Hig Med Trop. 2016;15 Suppl 1:s27-s34. Portuguese

Grol R, Zwaard A, Mokkink H, Dalhuijsen J, Casparie A. Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care. 1998;10(2):135-40.

Leite MP. Avaliando a qualidade de revistas científicas para a publicação de resultados de pesquisas e estudos. REME: rev mineira de enfermagem. 2009;13(3):317-9.

Stemberkova R, Matulova P, Štemberk J, Maresova P, Kuca K. Evaluation of research & development in selected Portuguese speaking countries. In: SGEM 2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. 2015:119-26.

Jsselmuiden CI, Klipp K. Para além das boas intenções: a iniciativa para a equidade na investigação [Beyond good intentions: the Research Fairness Initiative. An Inst Hig Med Trop. 2017;16 Suppl 2:s9-s10.

Cunha IF. A globalização da investigação em ciências sociais: o caso dos estudos de comunicação no espaço ibero-americano e lusófono [The globalization of research in social sciences: the case of communication studies in the ibero-american and lusophone space]. Matrizes. 2013;7(1):149-65. Portuguese

Rubio CF, Carioca CR. A carência de corpora para pesquisa e ensino e ensino no contexto da integração internacional lusófona [The corpora deficiency for research and teaching in the contexto of the lusophone international integration]. Rev Letras. 2016;2(35):21-37. Portuguese

Published

2022-08-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Portrait of the scientific production of the Member-states of the Community of Portuguese-Speaking Countries in the health sciences: a bibliometric study. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 20, 05-20. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2221