COVID-19 laboratory diagnosis: the whole truth, so far

Authors

  • Edna Ribeiro H&TRC - Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL – Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Miguel Brito H&TRC - Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL – Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2254

Keywords:

COVID-19, Laboratory diagnosis, Biological sampling, rRT_PCR, Immunologic rapid tests

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the most recent worldwide biological threat to humans worldwide with a severe impact in all areas of human development particularly health, economy, and mobility, caused by a virus belonging to the Coronaviridae family (SARS-CoV-2). Currently, the definite diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on the viral isolation or positive result of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed from sputum, nasal swab, or throat swab, although the virus has also been detected in blood and stool. Biological sample collection is performed based on the existing guidelines and PCR protocols had to be adapted. Both sampling and PCR must be performed by specialized professionals in order to avoid false negatives which have been reported in several published papers. Furthermore, considering the limitations of molecular tools such as highly skilled professionals, infrastructure limitations, and supply shortages, rapid diagnostic tests have also been developed based on the detection of viral components (Direct; antigen detection) and in the host immune response (Indirect; antibody detection). Titers of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies may be used as an indicator of COVID‐19 prognosis and to discriminate asymptomatic carriers which allows the establishment of the COVID-19 spectrum; however, the persistence, reduction, and duration of SARS‐CoV‐2 immunity antibodies require further investigation. In a period of a pandemic without a vaccine or specific medications to stop the virus progression, testing is the most important task to perform in order to identify and isolate infected persons, even if they don’t present symptoms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ceraolo C, Giorgi FM. Genomic variance of the 2019: nCoV coronavirus. J Med Virol. 2020;92(5):522-8.

World Health Organization. Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in suspected human cases: interim guidance [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331501/WHO-COVID-19-laboratory-2020.5-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. Sputum collection for tuberculosis (TB) testing. HealthLinkBC [Internet]. 2017;(51b). Available from: https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/healthlinkbc-files/sputum-tuberculosis-testing

Grant LR, Hammitt LL, Murdoch DR, O'Brien KL, Scott JA. Procedures for collection of induced sputum specimens from children. 2012;54(Suppl 2):S140-5.

Yukon Communicable Disease Control. Nasopharyngeal swab procedure [Internet]. UCDC; 2015 Oct. Available from: http://www.hss.gov.yk.ca/pdf/npswab.pdf

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for the collection of human specimens for laboratory diagnosis of avian influenza infection [homepage]. Geneva: WHO; 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/virology_laboratories_and_vaccines/guidelines_collection_h5n1_humans/en/

World Health Organization. Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases [homepage]. WHO; 2020 Mar 19. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/laboratory-testing-for-2019-novel-coronavirus-in-suspected-human-cases-20200117

Tan SC, Yiap BC. DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:ID574398.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel: for emergency use only [Internet]. CDC; 2020 Mar 30. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveil. 2020;25(3):2000045.

Chen L, Liu W, Zhang QI, Xu K, Ye G, Wu W, et al. RNA based mNGS approach identifies a novel human coronavirus from two individual pneumonia cases in 2019 Wuhan outbreak. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):313-9.

Tang YW, Schmitz JE, Persing DH, Stratton CW. The laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 infection: current issues and challenges. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(6):e00512-20.

“Pr es s Pr e,” 2019.

Feng H, Liu Y, Lv M, Zhong J. A case report of COVID-19 with false negative RT-PCR test: necessity of chest CT. Jpn J Radiol. 2020;38(5):409-10.

European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. An overview of the rapid test situation for COVID-19 diagnosis in the EU/EEA [Internet]. Stockholm: ECDC; 2020. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Overview-rapid-test-situation-for-COVID-19-diagnosis-EU-EEA.pdf

Racine R, Winslow GM. IgM in microbial infections: taken for granted? Immunol Lett. 2009;125(2):79-85.

Rokni M, Ghasemi V, Tavakoli Z. Immune responses and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 during an outbreak in Iran: comparison with SARS and MERS. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(3):e2107.

Haveri A, Smura T, Kuivanen S, Österlund P, Hepojoki J, Ikonen N, et al. Serological and molecular findings during SARS-CoV-2 infection: the first case study in Finland, January to February 2020. Euro Surveil. 2020;25(11):2000266.

Li Z, Yi Y, Luo X, Xiong N, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. J Med Virol. 2020;10.1002/jmv.25727. [Epub ahead of print]

Cassaniti I, Novazzi F, Giardina F, Salinaro F, Sachs M, Perlini S, et al. Performance of VivaDiag COVID‐19 IgM/IgG rapid test is inadequate for diagnosis of COVID‐19 in acute patients referring to emergency room department. J Med Virol. 2020;10.1002/jmv.25800. [Epub ahead of print]

Conti P, Younes A. Coronavirus COV-19/SARS-CoV-2 affects women less than men: clinical response to viral infection. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34(2). [Epub ahead of print]

Lippi G, Plebani M. Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection [letter to the editor]. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(7):1131-4.

Lippi G, Plebani M. The critical role of laboratory medicine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral outbreaks. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Mar 19. [Epub ahead of print]

Published

2022-07-27

Issue

Section

Artigos de Revisão

How to Cite

COVID-19 laboratory diagnosis: the whole truth, so far. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 23, 05-10. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2254