Diagnosis of Tinea pedis and onychomycosis in patients from Portuguese National Institute of Health: a four-year study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25758/set.684Keywords:
Tinea pedis, Onychomycosis, Frequency, Etiologic agents, VariablesAbstract
Tinea pedis and onychomycosis are two rather diverse clinical manifestations of superficial fungal infections, and their etiologic agents may be dermatophytes, non-dermatophyte moulds, or yeasts. This study was designed to statistically describe the data obtained as results of an analysis conducted during a four-year period on the frequency of Tinea pedis and onychomycosis and their etiologic agents. A questionnaire was distributed from 2006 to 2010 and answered by 186 patients, who were subjected to skin and/or nail sampling. Frequencies of the isolated fungal species were cross-linked with the data obtained with the questionnaire, seeking associations and pre-disposing factors. One hundred and sixty-three fungal isolates were obtained, 24.2% of which were composed of more than one fungal species. Most studies report the two pathologies as caused primarily by dermatophytes, followed by yeasts, and lastly by non-dermatophytic moulds. Our study does not challenge this trend. We found a frequency of 15.6% of infections caused by Dermatophytes (with a total of 42 isolates) of which T. rubrum was the most frequent species (41.4%). There was no significant association (p >0.05) between visible injury and the independent variables tested, namely age, gender, owning a pet, education, swimming pool attendance, sports activity, and clinical information. Unlike other studies, the variables considered did not show the expected influence on dermatomycosis of the lower limbs. It is hence necessary to conduct further studies to specifically identify which variables do in fact influence such infections.
Downloads
References
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. Onychomycosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(2):108-16.
Caputo R, De Boulle K, Del Rosso J, Nowicki R. Prevalence of superficial fungal infections among sports-active individuals: results from the Achilles survey, a review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001;15(4):312-6.
Szepietowski JC, Reich A, Garlowska E, Kulig M, Baran E, Onychomycosis Epidemiology Study Group. Factors influencing coexistence of toenail onychomycosis with Tinea pedis and other dermatomycoses: a survey of 2761 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(10):1279-84.
Grillot R. Les mycoses humaines: demarche diagnostique. Paris: Elsevier Masson; 1997. ISBN 9782906077799
Larone DH. Medically important fungi: a guide to identification. 4th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2002. ISBN 9781555811723
De Hoog GS, Cuarro GJ, Gene J, Figueras MJ. Atlas of clinical fungi. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2001. ISBN 9789070351434
Ghannoum MA, Hajjeh RA, Scher R, Konnikov N, Gupta AK, Summerbell R, et al. A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: the frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(4):641-8.
Rao CY, Burge HA, Chang JC. Review of quantitative standards and guidelines for fungi in indoor air. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1996;46(9):899-908.
Torres-Rodríguez JM, López-Jodra O. Epidemiology of nail infection due to keratinophilic fungi. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2000;17:122-35.
Arenas-Guzmán R. Dermatofitoses en Mexico [Dermatophytoses in Mexico]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2002;19:63-7. Spanish
Murray SC, Dawber RP. Onychomycosis of toenails: orthopaedic and podiatric considerations. Australas J Dermatol. 2002;43(2):105-12.
Szepietowski JC, Salomon J. Do fungi play a role in psoriatic nails? Mycoses. 2007;50(6):437-42.
Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW, Watteel GN, Summerbell RC. Prevalence and epidemiology of unsuspected onychomycosis in patients visiting dermatologists’ offices in Ontario, Canada: a multicenter survey of 2001 patients. Br J Dermatol. 1997;36(10):783-7.
Svejgaard EL, Nilsson J. Onychomycosis in Denmark: prevalence and fungal nail infection in general practice. Mycoses. 2004;47(3-4):131-5.
Abeck D, Haneke E, Nolting S. Onychomykose. Dt Ärzteblatt. 2000;97:1984-6. German
Bassiri-Jahromi S, Khaksari AA. Epidemiological survey of dermatophytosis in Tehran, Iran, from 2000 to 2005. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(2):142-7.
Borman AM, Campbell CK, Fraser M, Johnson EM. Analysis of the dermatophyte species isolated in the British Isles between 1980 and 2005 and review of worldwide dermatophyte trends over the last three decades. Med Mycol. 2007;45(2):131-41.
Duarte ML, Macedo C, Estrada I. Panorama epidemiológico das dermatofitoses no distrito de Braga: revisão de 15 anos (1983–1998). Trab Soc Port Dermatol Venereol. 2000;58:55-61. Portuguese
Lopes V, Velho G, Amorim M, Cardoso ML, Massa A, Amorim JM. Incidência de dermatófitos, durante três anos, num hospital do Porto (Portugal) [Three years incidence of dermatophytes in a hospital in Porto (Portugal)]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2002;19(4):201-3. Portuguese
Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Stinchi C, Lorenzi S. Onychomycosis due to Scopulariopsis brevicaulis: clinical features and response to systemic antifungals. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135(5):799-802.
Ruiz LR, Zaitz C. Dermatófitos e dermatofitoses na cidade de São Paulo no período de Agosto de 1996 a Julho de 1998 [Dermatophytes and dermatophytosis in the city of São Paulo, from August 1996 to July 1998]. An Bras Dermatol. 2001;76(4):391-401. Portuguese
Pinto GM, Tapadinhas C, Moura C, Medeiros MJ, Lacerda e Costa MH. Tinhas em crianças: revisão de 5 anos, 1988-1992. Trab Soc Port Dermatol Venereol. 1994;52:17-28. Portuguese
Rodrigo FG. Micoses superficiais. Trab Soc Port Dermatol Venereol. 1998;55(4):277-302. Portuguese
Teles R, Rosado ML. Micoses nos pés, numa amostragem colhida numa fábrica de montagem de automóveis numa região industrial dos arredores de Lisboa. Arq Inst Nac Saúde. 1989;14:175-8. Portuguese
Gianni C, Cerri A, Crosti C. Non-dermatophytic onychomycosis: an underestimated entity? A study of 51 cases. Mycoses. 2000;43(1-2):29-33.
Araújo AJ, Souza MA, Bastos OM, Oliveira JC. Onicomicoses por fungos emergentes: análise clínica, diagnóstico laboratorial e revisão [Onychomycosis caused by emergent fungi: clinical analysis, diagnosis and revision]. An Bras Dermatol. 2003;78(4):445-55. Portuguese
Garg A, Venkatesh V, Singh M, Pathak KP, Kaushal GP, Agrawal SK. Onychomycosis in central India: a clinicoetiologic correlation. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(7):498-502.
Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Lorenzi S. Onychomycosis caused by nondermatophytic molds: clinical features and response to treatment of 59 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(2 Pt 1):217-24.
Shemer A, Davidovici B, Grunwald MH, Trau H, Amichai B. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(1):37-9.
Summerbell RC. Epidemiology and ecology of onychomycosis. Dermatology. 1997;194 Suppl 1:32-6.
Meireles TE, Rocha MF, Brilhante RS, Cordeiro R de A, Sidrim JJ. Successive mycological nail tests for onychomycosis: a strategy to improve diagnosis efficiency. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(4):333-7.
Figueiredo VT, de Assis Santos D, Resende MA, Hamdan JS. Identification and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of 200 clinical isolates of Candida spp. responsible for fingernail infections. Mycopathologia. 2007;164(1):27-33.
Vella Zahra L, Gatt P, Boffa MJ, Borg E, Mifsud E, Scerri L, et al. Characteristics of superficial mycoses in Malta. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42(4):265-71.
Uchida K, Tanaka T, Yamaguchi H. Achievement of complete mycological cure by topical antifungal agent NND-502 in guinea pig model of Tinea pedis. Microbiol Immunol. 2003;47(2):143-6.
Gupta AK, Cooper EA, Macdonald P, Summerbell RC. Utility of inoculum counting (Walshe and English criteria) in clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis caused by nondermatophytic filamentous fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2115-21.
Nelson M, Martins A, Heffermast M. Dermatology in general medicine (Vol. II). 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
Singh D, Patel DC, Rogers K, Wood N, Riley D, Morris AJ. Epidemiology of dermatophyte infection in Auckland, New Zealand. Australas J Dermatol. 2003;44(4):263-6.
Kazemi A. Tinea unguium in the North-West of Iran (1996-2004). Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007;24(2):113-7.
Seebacher C, Bouchara JP, Mignon B. Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Mycopathologia. 2008;166(5-6):335-52.
Chermette R, Ferreiro L, Guillot J. Dermathophytoses in animals. Mycopathologia. 2008;166(5-6):385-405.
Pier AC, Smith JM, Alexiou H. Animal ringworm: its etiology, public health significance and control. J Med Vet Mycol. 1994;32(1):133-50.
Brandi G, Sisti M, Paparini A, Gianfranceschi G, Schiavano GF, De Santi M, et al. Swimming pools and fungi: an environmental epidemiology survey in Italian indoor swimming facilities. Int J Environ Health Res. 2007;17(3):197-206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Saúde e Tecnologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The journal Saúde & Tecnologia offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge available to the public free of charge provides greater worldwide democratization of knowledge.
The journal Saúde & Tecnologia does not charge authors any submission or article processing charges (APC).
All content is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license. Authors have the right to: reproduce their work in physical or digital form for personal, professional, or teaching use, but not for commercial use (including the sale of the right to access the article); deposit on their website, that of their institution or in a repository an exact copy in electronic format of the article published by Saúde & Tecnologia, provided that reference is made to its publication in Saúde & Tecnologia and its content (including symbols identifying the journal) is not altered; publish in a book of which they are authors or editors the total or partial content of the manuscript, provided that reference is made to its publication in Saúde & Tecnologia.
