Variability introduced by the operator in processing myocardial Gated-SPECT studies

Authors

  • Marta O. Antunes Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Rafael R. Gomes Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Lina Vieira Área Científica de Medicina Nuclear, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.944

Keywords:

Gated-SPECT, Inter-operator variability, Intra-operator variability, Quantitative parameters reproducibility

Abstract

Introduction – Gated - Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) is one of the cardiac imaging techniques with more development over the last decades. For image analysis, the use of quantification software leads to increased reproducibility and accuracy of interpretations. The purpose of this study is to assess, in Gated-SPECT studies, intra and inter-operator variability of quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion and function, obtained with the software Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) and Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS). Material and Methods – We used a non-probability sample of convenience of 52 patients who underwent myocardial Gated-SPECT studies for clinical indications and that formed ESTeSL’s Xeleris workstation database. The fifty-two studies were divided into two groups: Group I (GI) of 17 patients with normal myocardial perfusion images; Group II (GII) of 35 patients with perfusion defects in Gated-SPECT images. All studies were processed 5 times by 4 independent operators (with 3 years of experience in Nuclear Medicine Services with a sample mean of 15 Gated-SPECT studies per week). Friedman´s statistical test was used to assess intra and inter-operator variability, considering α = 0.01. Results and Discussion – To all variables, the respective p values did not reflect statistically significant differences (p> α). Thus, there was no significant intra or inter-operator variability in processing myocardial Gated-SPECT studies. Conclusion – QGS and QPS software allow a reproducible quantification of the evaluated function and perfusion parameters, with no variability introduced by the operator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Paul AK, Nabi HA. Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: basic principles, technical aspects, and clinical applications. J Nucl Med Technol. 2004;32(4):179-87.

Metcalfe MJ. The Cardiovascular System. In Sharp PF, Gemmell HG, Murray AD, editors. Practical nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2005. p. 168-77.

Yalçin H, Maza S, Yalçin F. Single photon emission computed tomography: an alternative imaging modality in left ventricular evaluation. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(5):1069-72.

Hesse B, Tägil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardiés M, Bax J, et al. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32(7):855-97.

Van den Broek W, Cuocolo A, Ghilardi A, Huggett S, Lecoultre R, Martin J, et al, editors. Myocardial perfusion imaging: a technologist’s guide. Vienna: Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging; 2004.

Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X, Lewin HC, Miranda R, Cohen I, et al. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(6):831-7.

Berman DS, Germano G. Evaluation of ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion, wall thickening, and other parameters with gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4(2 Pt 2):S169-71.

Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, Vinson EL, Smith WH, Beller GA. Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(7):1687-92.

Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, Siadaty MS, Ragosta M, Beller GA, et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):64-70.

Burrell S, MacDonald A. Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34(4):193-211.

Danias PG, Ahlberg AW, Travin MI, Mahr NC, Abreu JE, Marini D, et al. Visual assessment of left ventricular perfusion and function with electrocardiography-gated SPECT has high intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility among experienced nuclear cardiologists and cardiology trainees. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9(3):263-70.

Kowalsky RJ, Falen SW. Heart. In Kowalsky RJ, Falen SW, editors. Radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear pharmacy and nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Pharmacists Association; 2004. p. 515-60. ISBN 9781582120317

Castell-Conesa J, Aguadé-Bruix S, García-Burillo A, González JM, Canela T, Oller G, et al. Reproducibilidad de la gated-SPECT de perfusión miocárdica en la valoración de la función ventricular y su comparación con la ventriculografía isotópica [Reproducibility of measurements of left ventricular function with Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and comparison with blood pool radionuclide ventriculography]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57(10):931-8. Spanish

Mesquita CT, Pessoa MC, Vasconcelos PP, Oliveira Júnior AC, Dohmann HF, Reis AG, et al. Ventricular function following coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison between gated SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009;92(5):327-33, 344-50, 357-63.

Nichols K, Lefkowitz D, Faber T, Folks R, Cooke D, Garcia EV, et al. Echocardiographic validation of gated SPECT ventricular function measurements. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(8):1308-14.

Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Moriel M, Mazzanti M, Su HT, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(11):2138-47.

Schaefer WM, Lipke CS, Standke D, Kühl HP, Nowak B, Kaiser HJ, et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(8):1256-63.

Nakajima K, Higuchi T, Taki J, Kawano M, Tonami N. Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs. J Nucl Med. 2001 Oct; 42(10):1571-8.

Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Waechter P, Areeda J, Van Kriekinge S, Sharir T, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I: technical principles and reproducibility. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(4):712-9.

Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Kavanagh JT, Wishner SH, Berman DS, Kavanagh GJ. Repeatability of automatic left ventricular cavity volume measurements from myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5(5):477-83.

Akesson L, Svensson A, Edenbrant L. Operator dependent variability in quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion images. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24(6):374-9.

Mohammed AM, Naddaf SY, Mahdi FS, Al-Mutawa QI, Al-Dossary HA, Elgazzar AH. Impact of operator on determining functional parameters of nuclear medicine procedures. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(3):209-14.

America YG, Bax JJ, Dibbets-Schneider P, Pauwels EK, Van der Wall EE. Evaluation of the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software program in the presence of large perfusion defects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21(5):519-29.

Germano G, Berman DS, editors. Clinical Gated cardiac SPECT. 2nd edition. Singapore: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. ISBN 9781405131551

General Electric Healthcare. Nuclear medicine and PET. Millenium MG; 2010 [cited 2010 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/fun_img/nmedicine/mg/products/geo.html

Vieira L. Contributo para a optimização dos estudos de perfusão miocárdica utilizando imagens de medicina nuclear sincronizadas com o electrocardiograma [Dissertation]. Lisboa: Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa; 2010. Portuguese

Germano G. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(10):1499-507.

Calibio P, Masaro J. Basic statistical procedures and tables [Internet]. 10th ed. Acadia University; 2001 [cited 2013 Jul 29]. Available from: http://math.acadiau.ca/cabilio/StatLabs/BSPT%2802%29.pdf

Friedman’s tests in SPSS [Internet]. Virginia Commonwealth University; s.d. [cited 2013 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.or.vcu.edu/help/SPSS/SPSS.Friedman.pdf

Capelli Jr J, Fidel Jr R, Figueiredo CM, Teles RP. Alteração no volume do fluido gengival durante a retração de caninos superiores [Change in the gengival fluid volume during maxillary canine retraction]. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15(2):52-7. Portuguese

Bavelaar-Croon CD, America YG, Atsma DE, Dibbets-Schneider P, Zwinderman AH, Stokkel MP, et al. Comparison of left ventricular function at rest and post-stress in patients with myocardial infarction: evaluation with gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8(1):10-8.

Published

2022-09-08

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Variability introduced by the operator in processing myocardial Gated-SPECT studies. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 11, 05-10. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.944