Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H) of the intervertebral lumbar disc in the adult and its application in the imaging routine

Authors

  • J. Cruz Maurício Centro de Radiologia de Tomar. Tomar, Portugal. Clínica CREAR. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Maria Margarida Ribeiro Área Científica de Radiologia, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. Departamento de Anatomia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.1124

Keywords:

(1H) Spectroscopy, Lumbar intervertebral discs, Involution, Disc degeneration

Abstract

Aims – To show the potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the diagnosis of degenerative disease of the lumbar disc and to advocate the addition of this technique in the classification of the invertebral disc involution vs degeneration (L4-L5 and L5-S1) in the clinical routine of lumbar pain status, not related with mechanic causes. Material and method – We studied 102 out of 123 lumbar intervertebral discs. The distribution among spaces was 61 discs at L4-L5, 41 at the L5-S1 level, and 34 at the D12-L1 level. The magnetic resonance studies were performed using a 1.5 T scanner. A single-voxel Point Resolved Spectra Selection (PRESS) technique was used. The ratios [Lac/Nacetyl], [Nacetyl/(Lac+Lip)], and additionally the resonance of lipids were applied to evaluate the biochemistry of the discs, their involution, disc disruption, and eventual susceptibility to initiating the degeneration process. The ratios and the lipidic value of L4-L5-S1 discs were ascertained with the different behavior of D12-L1. Furthermore, the comparison between L4-L5, L5-S1, and D12-L1 discs was performed according to a rating in T2 weighted (adjusted scale 1-4 from Pfirrmann1 criteria). Results – Related to D12-L1, the ratios and the lipids of L4-L5-S1 discs are statistically different. When used as a complementary of conventional T2 weighted, they have good discrimination in all degrees of disc involution vs degeneration. The ratio [Lac/Nacetyl] at L4-L5-S1 level was increased when compared to D12-L1 (p=0.033 for disks with [1+2] score of involution and p=0.004 for disks with score [3+4]). These results suggest that disc degeneration vs involution in higher degrees defines a decrease in the lactate’s peak. The ratio [Nacetyl/(Lac+Lip)] provides good discrimination of involution between scores [1+2] and [3+4] at the L4-L5 level, presenting the values of the ratios (mean 0.65 and 0.5 with p=0.04). The mean ratio of [Nacetyl/(Lac+Lip)] in the L4-L5 disc was 1.8 times higher than that of L1-D12. The lipid spectrum at L4-L5-S1 in the higher scores showed no constant prevalence in the resonance frequencies. Conclusion – The (1H) spectroscopy of intervertebral discs may contribute with a supplementary semiology to the conventional MRI. The resonances of L4-L5 and L5-S1 discs, involuted or degenerated, must be related to D12-L1, which are more stable and have a lower likelihood of disc degeneration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001;26(17):1873-8.

Johannessen W, Auerbach JD, Wheaton AJ, Borthakur A, Reddy R, Elliott DM. Spin-lock (T1 rho) MRI as a quantitative measure of intervertebral disc degeneration. In Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2006. Paper no. 0016.

Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. “Stress” distributions inside intervertebral discs: the effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 1996;78(6):965-72.

Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):403-8.

Boos N, Dreier D, Hilfiker E, Schade V, Kreis R, Hora J, et al. Tissue characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic disc herniation’s by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Res. 1997;15(1):141-9.

Brown MF, Hukkanen MV, McCarthy ID, Redfern DR, Batten JJ, Crock HV, et al. Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the vertebral endplate in patients with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(1):147-53.

Ohtori S, Inoue G, Ito T, Koshi T, Ozawa T, Doya H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-immunoreactive cells and PGP 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibers in vertebral endplates of patients with discogenic low back pain and modic type I or type II changes on MRI. Spine. 2006;31(9):1026-31.

Haughton V. Medical imaging of intervertebral disc degeneration: current state of imaging. Spine. 2004;29(23):2751-6.

Ludescher B, Effelsberg J, Martirosian P, Steidle G, Matket B, Claussen C, et al. T2- and diffusion-maps reveal diurnal changes of intervertebral disc composition: an in vivo MRI study at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(1):252-7.

Wang YX, Zhao F, Yuan J, Mok GS, Ahuja AT, Griffith JF. Accelerated T1rho relaxation quantification in intervertebral disc using limited spin-lock times. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013;3(1):54-8.

Yuan J, Wang YX, Griffith JF. Intervertebral disc T1rho relaxation mapping with spin-lock 3D b-FFE imaging at 3T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2010;(18):3219.

Hoppe S, Quirbach S, Mamisch TC, Krause FG, Werlen S, Benneker LM. Axial T2 mapping in intervertebral discs: a new technique for assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(9):2013-9.

Zhang W, Ma X, Wang Y, Zhao J, Zhang X, Gao Y, et al. Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(9):1830-6. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

Kubota G, Eguchi Y, Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Kamoda H, et al. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of degenerative intervertebral discs: GP136. Spine: Affiliated Society Meeting Abstracts. 2011.

Cohen-Adad J, Wheeler-Kingshott C. Quantitative MRI of the spinal cord. Academic Press; 2014. ISBN 9780123969736

Cassinelli EH, Hall RA, Kang JD. Biochemistry of intervertebral disc degeneration and the potential for gene therapy applications. Spine J. 2001;1(3):205-14.

Crock HV. Internal disc disruption: a challenge to disc prolapsed fifty years old. Spine. 1986;11(6):650-3.

Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Bydder M, Yokoo T, Schwimmer JB, Kono Y, et al. The effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(1):145-52.

Drost DJ, Riddle WR, Clarke GD. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the brain: Report of AAPM MR task group #9. Med Phys. 2002;29(9):2177-97.

Puertas EB, Yamashita H, Oliveira VM, Souza PS. Classificação por ressonância magnética do disco intervertebral [Classification of intervertebral disc degeneration by magnetic resonance]. Acta Ortop Bras. 2009;17(1):46-9. Portuguese

Pritzker KP. Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc. Orthop Clin N Am. 1977;8(1):66-77.

Jarvik JG, Ollingworth W, Martin B, Emerson SS, Gray DT, Overman S, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2810-8.

Miller JA, Schmatz C, Schultz AB. Lumbar disc degeneration: correlation with age, sex, e spine level in 600 autopsy specimens. Spine. 1988;13(2):173-8.

Trout JJ, Buckwalter JA, Moore KC. Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc: II. Cells of the nucleus pulposus. Anat Rec. 1982;204(4):307-14.

Freemont AJ. The cellular pathobiology of the degenerate intervertebral disc and discogenic back pain. Rheumatology. 2009;48(1):5-10.

Gruber HE, Norton HJ, Ingram JA, Hanley EN Jr. The SOX9 transcription factor in the human disc: decreased immunolocalization with age and disc degeneration. Spine. 2005;30(6):625-30.

Hastreiter D, Ozuna RM, Spector M. Regional variations in certain cellular characteristics in human lumbar intervertebral discs, including the presence of alpha-smooth muscle actin. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(4):597-604.

Johnson WE, Eisenstein SM, Roberts S. Cell cluster formation in degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs is associated with increased disc cell proliferation. Connect Tissue Res. 2001;42(3):197-207.

Peng B, Wu W, Hou S, Li P, Zhang C, Yang Y. The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):62-7.

Resnick D, editor. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 1995. ISBN 9780721650661

Raj PP. Intervertebral disc: anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, treatment. Pain Pract. 2008;8(1):18-44.

Sharman A, Pilgram T, Wippold II FG. Association between annular tears and disc degeneration: a longitudinal study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;30:500-6.

Lotz JC, Haughton V, Boden SD, An HS, Kang JD, Massuda K, et al. New treatments and imaging, strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral discs. Radiology. 2012;264(1):6-19.

Majumdar S, Link TM, Steinbach LS, Hu S, Kurhanewicz J. Diagnostic tools and imaging methods in intervertebral disc degeneration. Orthop Clin N Am. 2011;42(4):501-11.

Zuo J, Saadat E, Romero A, Loo K, Li X, Link TM, et al. Assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration with magnetic resonance single-voxel spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(5):1140-6.

Uschold TD, Fusco D, Germain R, Tumialan LM, Chang SW. Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(9):1631-41.

Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK. CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(8):2057-66.

Franklin L, Hull EW. Lipid content of the intervertebral disc. Clin Chem. 1966;12(5):253-7.

Published

2022-09-07

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H) of the intervertebral lumbar disc in the adult and its application in the imaging routine. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 12, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.1124