PET/CT with 18-fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose in the follow-up of the cutaneous malignant melanoma

Authors

  • Sofia Batanete Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • J. R. Infante Serviço de Medicina Nuclear, Complexo Hospitalar Universitário. Badajoz, Espanha.
  • J. I. Rayo Serviço de Medicina Nuclear, Complexo Hospitalar Universitário. Badajoz, Espanha.
  • Lina Vieira Área Científica de Medicina Nuclear, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. Grupo de Investigação em Modelação e Optimização de Sistemas Multifuncionais, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/may.1164

Keywords:

Positron emission tomography, Computed tomography, 18Fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose, Cutaneous malignant melanoma, Follow-up

Abstract

Background – Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is one of the most lethal malignancies and the follow-up involves, in addition to clinical examination and analysis of tumor markers, several imaging methods such as the Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) exam with 18fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). The aim of the study is to evaluate the utility of PET/CT in the assessment of the extension of the disease and of suspected recurrence in the CMM, comparing the imaging findings with those described in CT studies. Methods – It was performed a retrospective analysis of 62 PET/CT studies in 50 patients diagnosed with CMM. It excluded a study that had a doubtful outcome (pulmonary nodule) and it was not possible to perform its diagnosis. The information related to the results of pathologic studies and imaging studies was obtained through medical history and medical reports of CT and PET/CT. A database was created with the collected data through Excel software and a descriptive statistical analysis was carried out. Results – Of the PET/CT studies analyzed, 31 were considered true positives (TP), 28 true negatives (TN), 1 false negative (FN), and 1 false positive (FP). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT for staging and evaluation of suspicious relapse in CMM are, respectively, 96.9%, 96.6%, 96.9%, 96.6%, and 96.7%. From the CT results considered in statistical analysis, 14 corresponded to TP, 12 to TN, 3 to FP, and 5 to FN. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV, and accuracy of CT for staging and evaluation of suspicious relapse in CMM are, respectively, 73.7%, 80.0%, 82.4%, 70.6%, and 76.5%. Compared to the CT results, PET/CT allowed a change in therapeutic approach in 23% of studies. Conclusion – PET/CT is a useful tool in evaluating CMM, characterized by high diagnostic accuracy in staging and in the evaluation of suspected recurrence of MMC compared to CT only.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meiriño R, Martínez E, Marcos M, Villafranca E, Domínguez MA, Illarramendi JJ, et al. Factores pronósticos en el melanoma maligno cutáneo [Prognostic factors in cutaneous malignant melanoma]. Anales Sis San Navarra. 2001;24 Suppl 1:167-72. Spanish

Krug B, Crott R, Lonneux M, Baurain JF, Pirson AS, Vander Borght T. Role of PET in the initial staging of cutaneous malignant melanoma: systematic review. Radiology. 2008;249(3):836-44.

Belhocine TZ, Scott AM, Even-Sapir E, Urbain JL, Essner R. Role of nuclear medicine in the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(6):957-67.

Pinilla I, Rodríguez-Vigil B, Gómez-León N. Integrated 18FDG PET/CT: utility and applications in clinical oncology. Clin Med Oncol. 2008;2:181-98.

Gritters LS, Francis IR, Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Initial assessment of positron emission tomography using 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in the imaging of malignant melanoma. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(9):1420-7.

Nicol I, Chuto G, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Brenot-Rossi I, Grob JJ, Richard MA. Place de la TEP-TDM au FDG dans le mélanome cutané [Role of FDG PET-CT in cutaneous melanoma]. Bull Cancer. 2008;95(11):1089-101. French

Mohr P, Eggermont AM, Hauschild A, Buzaid A. Staging of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20 Suppl 6:vi14-21.

Mervic L. Prognostic factors in patients with localized primary cutaneous melanoma. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2012;21(2):27-31.

Strobel K, Dummer R, Husarik DB, Pérez Lago M, Hany TF, Steinert HC. High-risk melanoma: accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases. Radiology. 2007;244(2):566-74.

Fuster D, Chiang S, Johnson G, Schuchter LM, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma? J Nucl Med. 2004;45(8):1323-7.

Crippa F, Leutner M, Belli F, Gallino F, Greco M, Pilotti S, et al. Which kinds of lymph node metastases can FDG PET detect? A clinical study in melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(9):1491-4.

Xing Y, Cromwell KD, Cormier JN. Review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the surveillance of melanoma patients. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:941921.

Mirk P, Treglia G, Salsano M, Basile P, Giordano A, Bonomo L. Comparison between F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and sentinel lymph node biopsy for regional lymph nodal staging in patients with melanoma: a review of the literature. Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:912504.

Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging, version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(1):181-200.

Heathcote A, Wareing A, Meadows A. CT instrumentation and principles of CT protocol optimization. In Hogg P, Testanera G, editors. Principles and practice of PET/CT – Part 1: a technologist’s guide. European Association of Nuclear Medicine; 2010. p. 54-68. ISBN 9783902785008

Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, Logan T, Coleman JJ 3rd, Hutchins G, et al. Inefficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scans for initial evaluation in early-stage cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2005;104(3):570-9.

Yancovitz M, Finelt N, Warycha MA, Christos PJ, Mazumdar M, Shapiro RL, et al. Role of radiologic imaging at the time of initial diagnosis of stage T1b-T3b melanoma. Cancer. 2007;110(5):1107-14.

Pinheiro AMC, Friedman H, Cabral ALSV, Rodrigues, HA. Melanoma cutâneo: características clínicas, epidemiológicas e histopatológicas no Hospital Universitário de Brasília entre janeiro de 1994 e abril de 1999 [Cutaneous melanoma: clinical, epidemiological and histopathological characteristics at the University Hospital of Brasília between January 1994 and April 1999]. An Bras Dermatol. 2003;78(2):179-86. Portuguese

Gon AS, Minelli L, Guembarovski AL. Melanoma cutâneo primário em Londrina [Primary cutaneous melanoma in Londrina]. An Bras Dermatol. 2001;76(4):413-26. Portuguese

Bower J. Utilization of PET/CT in melanoma. In ISRRT World Congress and CAMRT Annual General Conference, Toronto (Canada), June 7-10, 2012.

Reinhardt MJ, Joe AY, Jaeger U, Huber A, Matthies A, Bucerius J, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(7):1178-87.

Mottaghy FM, Sunderkötter C, Schubert R, Wohlfart P, Blumstein NM, Neumaier B, et al. Direct comparison of [18F]FDG PET/CT with PET alone and with side-by-side PET and CT in patients with malignant melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(9):1355-64.

Published

2022-09-06

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

PET/CT with 18-fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose in the follow-up of the cutaneous malignant melanoma. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 13, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.25758/may.1164