Tensions and challenges of the ethics of scientific health research: an open reflection

Authors

  • Hélder Raposo Unidade de Ensino e Investigação em Psicologia e Sociologia, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. Centro de Investigação e Estudos em Sociologia, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. H&TRC – Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL – Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2264

Keywords:

Ethical regulation, Health research, Social sciences, Scientific integrity

Abstract

Ethics and research are dimensions that are increasingly interdependent, so the broad debate around the promotion of an ethical culture of rigor and demanding scrutiny corresponds to a concern that is effectively transversal to all areas of scientific knowledge. This article of theoretical reflection is intended to highlight the characteristics and trends underlying the evolution of ethical regulation in scientific research, but also to raise some critical questions in terms of the implications, tensions, and challenges that this reality entails. On the one hand, the demand for more robust ways of safeguarding scientific integrity and the credibility of research is well understood. But on the other hand, the emergence of a certain temptation to narrow the conception of research is notorious, since the reinforcement of regulation may carry the risk of some bureaucratization and normalization of ethical scrutiny. The challenge for ethical regulation is to establish more demanding forms of deliberation and better adapted to the new dynamics of scientific research, without, however, this implying the strangulation of innovative research or the establishment of uniform regulatory procedures that can, therefore, be maladjusted to the reality of scientific traditions distinct from clinical and biomedical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bülow W, Helgesson G. Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Med Health Care Philos. 2019;22(2):245-52.

All European Academies [ALLEA]. Código Europeu de conduta para a integridade da investigação [Internet]. Berlim: ALLEA; 2018. Available from: https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017-Digital_PT.pdf

Cascais AF. Genealogia, âmbito e objecto da bioética. In: Silva JR, Barbosa A, Vale FM, editors. Contributos para a bioética em Portugal. Lisboa: Cosmos; 2002. p. 47-136. ISBN 9789727622382

Cascais AF. Comentário: a bioética, ou a crise das regulações. O que é dado à sociologia saber/fazer? In: Carapinheiro G, Correia T, editors. Novos temas de saúde, novas questões sociais. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais; 2015. p. 31-8. ISBN 9789898536440

Carvalho T, Correia T, Serra H. Professions under suspicion: what role for professional ethics and commitment in contemporary societies [guest editorial]. Sociol Probl Prat. 2018;(88):9-25.

Power M. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. ISBN 9780198296034

Raposo H. Apreciação ética de projectos de investigação em saúde: uma reflexão situada a propósito da ética de investigação em ciências sociais [Ethical appraisal of health research projects: A situated reflection on the ethics of research in the social sciences]. Sociol Online. 2016;(12):22-48. Portuguese

Fleischer S, Schuch P, editors. Ética e regulamentação na pesquisa antropológica. Brasília: Letras Livres, Editora Universidade de Brasília; 2010. ISBN 9788598070247

White J, Fitzgerald T. Researcher tales and research ethics: the spaces in which we find ourselves. Int J Res Method Educ. 2010;33(3):273-85.

Neves MP. As comissões de ética hospitalares e a institucionalização da bioética em Portugal [The hospital ethics committees and the institutionalization of bioethics in Portugal]. Rev Bioética. 1995;3(1). Portuguese

Lourenço I. Comissões de ética no ensino superior: primar pela integridade científica, uma necessidade do séc. XXI. IPCB Campus: rev Inst Polit Castelo Branco. 2018;8(13):12-5.

Oliveira L. Desafios à universidade: comercialização da ciência e recomposição dos saberes académicos. Sociol Probl Prat. 2000;(34):93-116.

Rubião A. História da universidade: genealogia para um “modelo participativo”. Coimbra: Almedina; 2013. ISBN 9789724051789

Garcia JL, Martins H. O ethos da ciência e as suas transformações contemporâneas, com especial atenção sobre a biotecnologia. In: Villaverde-Cabral M, Wall K, Aboim S, Silva FC, editors. Itinerários: a investigação nos 25 anos do ICS. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais; 2008. p. 397-417. ISBN 9789726712244

Patrício MT, Conceição CP, editors. Redes e colaborações científicas: os programas de parcerias internacionais em Portugal. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais; 2015. ISBN 9789898536501

Howick J. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. ISBN 9781405196673

Hammersley M. Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research. Sociol Res Online. 2010;15(4):123-5.

Derbyshire S. The ethical dilemma of ethical committees. Sociol Compass. 2008;2(5):1506-22.

Hoeyer K, Dahlager L, Lynöe N. Conflicting notions of research ethics: the mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(8):1741-9.

Guerriero IC, Minayo MC. O desafio de revisar aspectos éticos das pesquisas em ciências sociais e humanas: a necessidade de diretrizes específicas [The challenge of reviewing ethical aspects of social and human research: the need for specific guidelines]. Physis Rev Saúde Colet. 2013;23(3):763-82. Portuguese

Published

2022-07-27

Issue

Section

Artigos de Revisão

How to Cite

Tensions and challenges of the ethics of scientific health research: an open reflection. (2022). Saúde & Tecnologia, 23, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.2264