Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis

Authors

  • Generosa Batista Serviço de Patologia Clínica, Hospital do Espírito Santo de Évora, EPE. Évora, Portugal.
  • Zúzeca Magalhães Serviço de Imunohemoterapia, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, EPE. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Renato Abreu Área Científica de Análises Clínicas e Saúde Pública, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Elisa Caria Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Ana Almeida Área Científica de Análises Clínicas e Saúde Pública, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204

Keywords:

Echinococcus granulosus, Hydatidosis, ELISA, FEIA

Abstract

Hydatidosis, also known as hydatid cyst, is caused by the larval stages of the parasite Echinococcus granulosus. Its diagnostic relies mainly on clinical findings, epidemiology, and imaging techniques supported by serological tests. Surgery is the commonest treatment; it is important to have a definitive diagnosis of hydatidosis before surgery, to avoid the spread of the cysts during the procedure. In this study, two immunoserologic tests for the diagnostic of hydatidosis are compared: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G; and Fluoro-Enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA) for immunoglobulin E. Of the 55 patients included in this study are in a pre-surgery stage, 31% have a calcified hydatic cyst, 54,5% a not calcified cyst and 14.5% have no hydatic cyst. Both tests had the same specificity (87.5%), and the sensitivity of the ELISA IgG was lower (63.8%) than the FEIA IgE (76.6%). The correlation observed between both tests was good (r = 0.726, p < 0.05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

David-Morais JA. Estudo epidemiológico da equinococosehidatidose no distrito de Évora: problemática metodológica. Rev Port Doenç Infec. 1997;20(3):137-45. Portuguese

David-Morais JA. A hidatidologia em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian; 1998. ISBN 9723108119

David-Morais JA. Hidatidose humana: estudo clínico-epidemiológico no distrito de Évora durante um quarto de século [Human hydatidosis in the district of Évora, Portugal: a clinical-epidemiological study over a quarter of a century]. Acta Med Port. 2007;20:1-10. Portuguese

Rey L. Bases da parasitologia médica. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2002. ISBN 8527706938

Biava MF, Dao A, Fortier B. Laboratory diagnosis of cystic hydatic disease. World J Surg. 2001 Jan;25(1):10-4.

Ortona E, Vaccari S, Marqutti P, Delunardo F, Rigano R, Profumo E, et al. Immunological characterization of Echinococcus granulosus cyclophilin, an allergen reactive with IgE and IgG4 from patients with cystic echinococcosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002 Apr;128(1):124-30.

Zhang W, Li J, McManus DP. Concepts in immunology and diagnosis of hydatic disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jan;16(1):18-36.

Carmena D, Martínez J, Benito A, Guisantes JA. Shared and non-shared antigens from three different extracts of the metacestode of Echinococcus granulosus. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005 Dec;100(8):861-7.

Afferni C, Pini C, Misiti-Dorello P, Bernardini L, Conchedda M, Vicari G. Detection of specific IgE antibodies in sera from patients with hydatidosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1984 Mar;55(3):587-92.

Sbihi Y, Rmiqui A, Rodriguez-Cabezas MN, Orduña A, Rodriguez-Torres A, Osuna A. Comparative sensitivity of six serological tests and diagnostic value of ELISA using purified antigen in hydatidosis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(1):14-8.

Published

2009-05-15

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Evaluation of two laboratory methods for the diagnosis of hydatidosis. (2009). Saúde & Tecnologia, 03, 15-18. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.204