Comparative study of experimental and computational procedures for the calculation of molecular lipophilicity

Authors

  • Gonçalo Clemente Técnico de Medicina Nuclear especializado em Química Inorgânica Biomédica.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.344

Keywords:

Lipophilicity, Log P, RP-HPLC, Computational calculation

Abstract

Background – Lipophilicity is one of the physicochemical properties that most influence the ability of a molecule to move through biological compartments. The octanol/water partition coefficient (log P) can give us an estimation of the drug absorption in the organism. The existence of indirect methods for a quick calculation of log P may have great importance in the analysis of lists of compounds with potential pharmacological action, reducing them to those that are expected to have better biological behavior. Objectives – The purpose of this work is to present a RP-HPLC chromatographic method developed for the indirect determination of molecular lipophilicity and evaluate the performance of different computational programs that calculate this same parameter. Methods – For this study were selected 25 compounds, then was evaluated the log P of each one by RP-HPLC and finally, the obtained results were compared with those calculated by seven computational programs. Results – The tested RP-HPLC method proved to be advantageous in comparison with the conventional shake flask technique. The indirect calculation program that provides results closest to the experimentally obtained was ALOGPS© 2.1. Conclusions – The ideal choice for determining the lipophilicity of compounds whose log P is estimated to be between 0 and 6 is the experimental indirect method by RP-HPLC, especially regarding the quickness and simplicity of this procedure. For the computational methods, it was concluded that none of the programs, including ALOGPS© 2.1, proved to be effective in the evaluation of isomers. For this kind of compounds, it will be always necessary the shake flask or the RP-HPLC technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hansch C, Fujita T. p-σ-π Analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86(8):1616-26.

Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;46(1-3):3-26.

Nandihalli UB, Duke MV, Duke SO. Prediction of RP-HPLC log P from semiempirical molecular properties of diphenyl ether and phenopylate herbicides. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(4):582-7.

Braumann T. Determination of hydrophobic parameters by reversed-phase liquid chromatography; Theory, experimental techniques, and application in Studies on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. J Chromatogr. 1986;373(2):191-225.

Joint Research Centre – Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Testing-methods, Annex V – A.8. Partition coefficient: Directive 92/69/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities. 1992;L(383A). Available from: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Testing-Methods/ANNEXV/A08web1992.pdf

Pomper MG, VanBrocklin H, Thieme AM, Thomas RD, Kiesewetter DO, Carlson KE, et al. 11β-methoxy-, 11 β-ethyl- and 17α-ethynyl-substituted 16α -fluoroestradiols: receptor-based imaging agents with enhanced uptake efficiency and selectivity. J Med Chem. 1990;33(12):3143-55.

Ferber B, Top S, Vessibres A, Welter R, Jaouen G. Synthesis of optically pure o-formylcyclopentadienyl metal complexes of 17α-ethynylestradiol: recognition of the planar chirality by the estrogen receptor. Organometallics. 2006;25(24):5730-9.

Hillard EA, Pigeon P, Vessières A, Amatore C, Jaouen G. The influence of phenolic hydroxy substitution on the electron transfer and anti-cancer properties of ferrocenyl compounds based on the 1,1-diphenyl-1-butene Motif. Dalton Trans. 2007;43:5073-81.

Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY, Kasheva TN, Villa AE. Internet software for the calculation of the lipophilicity and aqueous solubility of chemical compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2001;41(2):246-52.

Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY. Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002;42(5):1136-45.

Ghose AK, Pritchett A, Crippen GM. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships III: modelling hydrophobic interactions. J Comput Chem. 1988;9(1):80-90.

Kier LB, Hall LH. The e-state as an extended free valence. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1997;37(3):548-52.

Wang R, Fu Y, Lai L. A new atom-additive method for calculating partition coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1997;37(3):615-21.

Meylan WM, Howard PH. Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84(1):83-92.

Hansch C, Leo A. Exploring Qsar: hydrophobic, electronic and steric constants. Washington-DC: American Chemical Society; 1995. XIX, 348 p. ISBN-13: 978-0841229921.

Ertl P, Rohde B, Selzer P. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. J Med Chem. 2000;43(20):3714-7.

Manhold R, Dross K. Calculation procedures for molecular lipophilicity: a comparative study. Quant Struct-Act Relat. 1996;15(5):403-9.

Published

2011-05-15

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Comparative study of experimental and computational procedures for the calculation of molecular lipophilicity. (2011). Saúde & Tecnologia, 05, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.344