The utility of PET/CT with 18F-FDG in the study of Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Authors

  • Marta Milhões Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • José Rafael Infante Serviço de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Infanta Cristina. Badajoz, Espanha.
  • Juan Rayo Madrid Serviço de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Infanta Cristina. Badajoz, Espanha.
  • L. B. Garcia Serviço de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Infanta Cristina. Badajoz, Espanha.
  • Lina Vieira Área Científica de Medicina Nuclear, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25758/set.264

Keywords:

PET/CT, 18F-FDG, Hodgkin's lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract

Lymphomas are tumors established in the lymphatic system. Due to their heterogeneity, they can be classified as Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), presenting each type of lymphoma, different prognosis, and chemotherapeutic response. Currently, Photon Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) is considered the "image" of excellence in the study of this pathology. In this context, it is of interest in this article to verify the usefulness of the PET/CT technique and to correlate the value of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) obtained by PET with the histological stage of lymphoma and the response to chemotherapeutic treatment. Methodology - We studied retrospectively 356 studies for 231 patients that did a PET/CT for staging, or evaluation of a mass or of the response to treatment. After administration of an average activity of 18F-FDG of 288.6 MBq, images were acquired on a PET/CT GE Discovery ST. These results were compared with the clinical data of patients. Results - Significant differences were found between age vs type of lymphoma. No significant differences were found between: the value of SUVmaxim nodes, extra-nodal lesions, and their value of SUV for the type of lymphoma. It verified the influence of PET/CT in the alteration of the stage of lymphoma as well as the therapeutic decision. Finally were found respectively the following values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: were 98%, 79%, and 88%. Conclusions - The results show the importance of imaging PET/CT in evaluating the stage of the tumor and its role in monitoring and change of therapeutic decisions.

References

Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006. 47(8):1326-34.

Terasawa T, Nihashi T, Hotta T, Nagai H. 18F-FDG PET for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin’s disease and aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a systematic review. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(1):13-21.

Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. J Nuc Med. 2002;43(8):1018-27.

Juweid ME. 18F-FDG PET as a routine test for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin’s disease and aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: where is the evidence? J Nuc Med. 2008;49(1):9-12.

Tatsumi M, Kitayama H, Sugahara H, Tokita N, Nakamura H, Kanakura Y, et al. Whole-body hybrid PET with 18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(4):601-8.

Guay C, Lépine M, Verreault J, Bénard F. Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin’s disease for posttreatment evaluation. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(8):1225-31.

Palestro CJ, Rini JN, Thomas MB. Lymphoma. In: Charron M, editor. Practical pediatric PET imaging. New York: Springer Science; 2006. p. 220-42.

de la Serra Torroba J. Linfoma de Hodgkin. JANO – Medicina y Humanidades. 2003;LXIV(1470):60-4.

Menzel C. Hodgkin’s disease and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. In: Ruhlmann J, Oehr P, Biersack H-J, editors. PET in oncology: basics and clinical application. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 158-65.

Lynch TB. Lymphom. In: Lynch TB, editor. PET/CT in clinical practice. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 48-71.

Jerusalem GH, Hustinx R, Rigo P. PET and PET/CT imaging in lymphoma. In: Valk PE, Delbeke D, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN, editors. Positron emission tomography: clinical practice. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 125-46.

Wong CY, Thie J, Parting-Lynch KJ, Zakalik D, Margolis JH, Gaskill M, et al. Glucose-normalized standardized uptake value from 18F-FDG PET in classifying lymphomas. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(10):1659-63.

Rigacci, L, Vitolo U, Nassi L, Merli F, Gallamini A, Pregno P, et al. Positron emission tomography in the staging of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a prospective multicentric study by the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. Ann Hematol. 2007;86(12):897-903.

Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Fishman EK, Wahl RL. Direct comparison of FDG PET and CT findings in patients with lymphoma: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;237(3):1038-45.

Dhanapathi H, Kumar R. F-18 FDG PET/PET-CT in the management of lymphoma. Indian J Med Pediatr Oncol. 2007;28(3):17-23.

Schöder H, Meta J, Yap C, Ariannejad M, Rao J, Pelps ME, et al. Effect of whole-body 18F-FDG PET imaging on clinical staging and management of patients with malignant lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(8):1139-43.

Hoh CK, Glaspy J, Rosen P, Dahlbom M, Lee SJ, Kunkel L, et al. Whole-body FD-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin’s disease and lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(3):343-8.

Metser U, Goor O, Lerman H, Naparstek E, Even-Sapir E. PET–CT of extranodal lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(6):1579-86.

Chalapud J, Sobrevilla-Calvo P, Rivas-Vera S, Altamirano-Levy J. Marked improvement in detecting the number of involved nodal areas in lymphoma, using 18F-FDG – PET and CT scan. Blood (ASH Meeting Abstracts). 2005;106:abstract 1344.

Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(5):885-95.

Beyer T, Antoch G, Müller S, Egelhof T, Freudenberg LS, Debatin J, et al. Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004;45 Suppl 1:25S-35S.

Published

2009-11-15

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

The utility of PET/CT with 18F-FDG in the study of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. (2009). Saúde & Tecnologia, 04, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.25758/set.264